Federal Election 2006
Conservative Party wins a Minority Government

NS Incumbents Returned
Election 2006
NS Candidates

Report Card, Questionnaire, Information
Click here

After Same-Sex Marriage?
Click Here

Now is the time to ask questions about the Provincial Tories...... Send us a note at clcns@clcns.com

Click Item for More Information
Paper on the Morning After Pill
Resources - Homosexual Marriages
The Catholic Voter
Canadians support legal protection for the unborn.
Family and Life Resources and Sex Education
Tax funded Abortions in NS [FAQ's]

CLC Canada Newsletter

Voting Record of NS MPs during the last Parliament

Click Here
Special Reports

News Ticker provided by LifeSiteNews.Com

Index of News Items

TOP


January 28, 2006 –Thoughts and concerns on the Federal Election 2006

Two or three years ago, I sent Jean Chretien, then prime minister an open letter, encouraging him for the sake of history not to pursue 'Same-sex Marriage' for it would spell the demise of Canada and be his legacy. The letter has shown up on the Internet and other places. Subsequent to that letter I asked the new Prime Minister (Martin) to hurry the path to destruction, so that we could rebuild our county, with moral, spiritual, and family values, for these values have withstood the test of time. Please read on to understand what I meant.

The letter spoke about the birth and death of societies. Societies have come and gone over the centuries that phenomenon has been studied by some very enterprising and astute individuals. They noted that societies die usually from within first before succumbing to other forces. Studies of past great civilizations seem to support this notion, observing that acceptance of homosexual behaviour is often a visible element of that culture in demise. This was true in Noah’s day, Sodom, Gibeah, Corinth, Rome, Germany and others. The noted researchers were Dr. Pitirim Sorokin, Phd, Sociologist and author of the book, “The American Sexual Revolution” and J.D. Udwin, noted British Historian, Carl Wilson and even Will Durant “Lessons of History”. Their works were highlighted by others and brought to light by Kerbie Andersen of Probe Ministries, whom I heard speak on Focus on the Family with Dr. James Dobson a few years ago discussing “Living Ethically in the Nineties”.

A weak but a bird’s eye view of collapse of society has just taken place within the Liberal Party and the PC’s before that, they became corrupt from within and weaken, and unable to defend themselves, and a new and more disciplined order will be necessary for rebirth. In society it seems that moral certitudes or absolutes are necessary for the preservation of the common good of society, I believe protects us all.

These researchers mostly sociologist describe a process that was led by spiritual decline and was reflected by certain characteristics and in which morality, social and economics were affected and marked the end of society. The acceptance of homosexuality, the reduced importance of family and children were noted. Sex for pleasure both male and females with no support for families or desire for children. You can read more on our website http://www.clcns.com/crisis of the century.htm about the vary stages or the brief that was presented by Herm Wills at the marriage hearing held in the year 2003. http://www.clcns.com/marriagebrief3.htm. Herm Wills is a pro-life, pro-family activist without much formal education nor training but a father and grandfather who care about Canada and the Family, who would invite others to join in the battle.

If I could advise the new leader of Canada and those seeking public office, it would be to learn more about families, the importance of families to the security and future of our country. I would further advise them to learn to evangelize in the sense that they should be able to articulate those values of family, marriage and life without compromise and with prayer and support from others, they could deliver the message to non-Christians or those hostile to Christianity for that may be the first and only Gospel message they’ll ever hear.

I would recommend that Vote Marriage Canada, Enshrine Marriage Canada and other like minded organizations pool their efforts and move out in front by providing training and leadership to people interested in strengthening and enriching our Country through the preservation of traditional marriage and the traditional families. There should be adequate training for spokespersons in all major media cities in Canada singing from the same or similar songbooks.

This past election it was woefully apparent that the candidates did not know how to articulate the defense for marriage, family and life. Love him or hate him they should take a page from the book of George W. Bush. His message has been consistent and to the point, framed in a manner that is easily understood and in such a way that to challenge it would not look good for the challenger.

I would further recommend prayer warriors to pray for the success in changing history that seems to repeat itself and restore Canada back to its moral anchors. For at the present moral relativism is underpinning the security and future of Canada.

It remains to be seen what Stephen Harper will accomplish, for he now can speak eloquently for all conservatives who want to conserve the family, our Judeo Christian heritage and the country or for those who unwittingly would see it destroyed.

Recently, he has said that he would like to deal with the Same Sex Marriage (Homosexual Marriage) issue. Likely, to see the current legislation stand and move onward. He will keep his promise but won’t wait until the situation in the house is fully assessed to its outcome. His promise is more to do with the definition of a ‘free-vote’ than it has to do with the issue. Since he wants to preserve the definition of marriage between one man and one woman, but accepts civil unions. It will take time to assess the new parliament to see if there is enough support to carry the vote for the traditionalist. It is difficult to see how it can be done, for to win the vote would surely mean using Section 33 of the charter, which he has vowed not to use. This is why I think the vote will be sooner rather than later and may only be on the definition of marriage.

We as family concerned citizens need to be fully aware of what is happening, and our moral leaders have to stand up to the plate with us and help us to carry the cross. It is time to speak loud and clear an action that was not done during the past election. The reason being that those with social conservative views were kept in check by the media and those seeking office were too intimidated by their handlers and the media.

The real winners in this election was the ‘Media Party’, they controlled the mindset of many people without ever trying to understand the social conservative viewpoint and they won the day in the Maritimes. We do NOT have a public nor a media voice, because of reasons cited above, we must prepare and engage this war of values.

I am just a concerned father and grandfather, who come from a dysfunctional background and was lucky enough to grow in love with family and life. I apologize for my written word and poor use of language.



Herm Wills

TOP

 


UN Catholic Lobby Hoping for Less Hostile Canadian Representatives

By Hilary White

NEW YORK, January 27, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) – The Catholic Family and Human Rights Institute (CFAM), has congratulated Canadians on the Conservative victory in Monday’s federal election and says it looks forward to a less hostile set of UN appointees from Canada.

Calling the Liberal-appointed Canadian representatives to the UN, “notoriously hostile” to UN supporters of life and family, Austin Ruse said, “Over the past 12 years, the Liberal Party's choices for Canadian Ambassador to the United Nations and for membership in delegations to U.N. conferences have advanced the pro-abortion, pro-homosexual marriage and pro-prostitution agenda.”

Wendy Wright, Executive Vice President of Concerned Women for America, told the Friday Fax that under a Liberal Government the foreign social policy of Canada "has been in the forefront" in supporting the "most radical policies" that are considered at the UN.

These policies include the Canadian delegation's recent opposition to anti-prostitution language being put into drafts of proposed UN treaties. Canada has a poor international reputation in human sex-trafficking and under the Liberal government included immigration provisions to improve what it saw as a shortage of “exotic dancers.”

In March, 2005, The Irish Anti-Trafficking Coalition (IATC) warned Monday that legalizing prostitution in Canada would make the country a “magnet for human trafficking.” Gregory Carlin, IATC Director said, “Canada is one of those countries with legalized child sex tourism and remains a popular ‘holiday’ destination for sex predators from the US,”

Although Prime Minister elect Harper did not recall him, Canada’s ambassador to the US, Frank McKenna, resigned earlier this week. C-Fam’s Friday Fax speculates that the radically pro-abortion “Catholic” ambassador to the UN, Allan Rock, will also be recalled.

Read related LifeSiteNews.com coverage:
Even Stripper Industry Insiders Charging Canadian Government With Trafficking in Women
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2005/may/05053107.html


------------------------------------------------------------------------
(c) Copyright: LifeSiteNews.com is a production of Interim Publishing. Permission to republish is granted (with limitation*) but acknowledgement of source is *REQUIRED* (use LifeSiteNews.com).

TOP

Washington Post - January 28, 2006
In New York, a Grisly Traffic in Body Parts
Illegal Sales Worry Dead's Kin, Tissue Recipients
By Michael Powell and David Segal

NEW YORK - Hundreds of very live Americans are walking around with pieces of
the wrong dead people inside of them. A macabre scandal has spread from a
body-harvesting lab in New Jersey to hospitals as far away as Florida,
Nebraska and Texas as hundreds of people discover that they have received
tissue and bone carved from looted corpses, not least the cadaver of
Alistair Cooke, the late and erudite host of PBS's "Masterpiece Theatre."
The Brooklyn district attorney and federal Food and Drug Administration
inspectors are investigating dozens of funeral homes in New York City and
Biomedical Tissue Services Ltd. of Fort Lee, N.J., which is run by a former
dentist who, his lawyer acknowledges, abused intravenous pain medications
while with patients. The former dentist came to funeral homes, investigators
say, and extracted bone, tendons and skin from corpses without the consent
of relatives. Later, Biomedical Tissue Services shipped coolers full of
tissue to hospitals for surgeries. A dead body can be worth tens of
thousands of dollars when it is dissected for parts. The scandal raises
questions about the safety and proper supervision of a billion-dollar-a-year
industry that supplies skin and tissue for 1 million tissue transplants each
year. But patients are most confounded by the skin-crawling fact that no one
knows from whom the bone and tissue was harvested.

Heather Augustin, 42, lives in southern New Jersey and had two disks in her
neck removed last year, supposedly replaced with bone taken from a youngish
corpse. Three months later, her surgeon told her that her new neck bone had
in fact come from rogue funeral homes, likely from the cadaver of a very old
person. Augustin hasn't slept particularly well since. "You think, 'I'm
carrying a bone in my neck from someone who didn't want to get chopped up,'"
she said. "I'm, like, in total shock. What am I supposed to do with these
thoughts?"

FDA spokesmen say risk of serious infection is fairly remote, though an
agency advisory adds the caveat that the "actual infectious risk is
unknown." A 41-year-old woman who underwent back surgery on Long Island and
two patients in New Jersey say they contracted syphilis from stolen bone
tissue. The FDA forbids body-harvesting firms from cutting up cancerous and
diseased corpses. In all cases, harvesters are supposed to screen cadavers
based on age and cause of death, and harvested tissue is tested for disease
and treated with antiviral or antibacterial agents. "We know that they
obtained these bodies in a fraudulent way and off the scale of acceptable
practice," FDA spokesman Stephen King said. Bone can be transplanted whole
or fashioned into chips for spinal fusion surgery. Much harvested skin -
about 18,900 square feet of it in 2003 - goes to burn victims.

The Daily News broke the scandal in October, fingering several Brooklyn
funeral home operators who had harvested patients without the permission of
family members. In one case, reporters found that the English Brothers
Funeral Home had forged consent and cause-of-death documents and allowed
Biomedical Tissue Services to harvest the cancer-ridden body of Michael
Bruno, a 75-year-old former cabbie. That article ran under the headline
"They Carved Up My Father!" The funeral home did not return calls seeking
comment. The New York City medical examiner's office in the past few months
has exhumed three bodies from cemeteries in Brooklyn and Queens.
Investigators discovered one female cadaver missing about half its body.

The New Jersey biomedical firm shipped large coolers filled with tissue to
five suppliers across the nation. No one knows how many patients are
affected. But the examples uncovered so far are suggestive:

Between early 2004 and September 2005, 60 surgical patients at Shore
Memorial Hospital in Somers Point, N.J., received implants said to have
originated with the corpse-snatching ring. Another 74 patients in Nebraska
received stolen bone tissue during surgeries in the same period.

Biomedical Tissue Services operated out of a third-floor office suite not
far from the George Washington Bridge, on the fringe of a large industry
with a low profile. Its president is Michael Mastromarino, who once had a
thriving dental practice off Fifth Avenue and a specialty in implant
surgery. Over the years, he struggled with drug abuse and was sued for
malpractice by several patients, one of whom accused Mastromarino of
deserting a patient under general anesthesia in mid-operation. Mastromarino
was found, according to the lawsuit, in his bathroom with a hypodermic
needle stuck in his arm, blood on the floor. Mastromarino surrendered his
dental license six years ago, went into rehab and two years ago went into
the tissue recovery business.

His lawyer, Mario Gallucci, said his client never broke the law. It's the
funeral parlor's job to obtain consent from prospective donors, he said.
Mastromarino and his employees would simply show up and harvest tissue,
taking a cursory look to make sure it was viable and the body as described.
"If you're told by the funeral home that it's a 45-year-old woman and you
show up and she's 90 years old, there's a problem," Gallucci said.
Biomedical Tissue Services was not an accredited member of the American
Association of Tissue Banks, nor did the company ever apply. But Robert
Rigney, who heads the association, said he doubted anyone now living with
tissue originating from the company is in any kind of health danger, because
the processors the company dealt with would have subjected any tissue to
screening. Still, Rigney is appalled. "If these people did what is alleged
here, what they have done is unconscionable," he said.

Alistair Cooke died of cancer at age 95 in March 2004. He wanted to be
cremated, and harbored a horror of being cut open. His daughter, a pastor in
Vermont, said district attorney's investigators contacted her recently to
say they had discovered forged papers, allegedly signed by Cooke's family,
allowing his bones and tissue to be removed. Investigators said they had
evidence his body parts had been implanted in patients but declined to
provide details. Cooke was far too old to be an acceptable candidate for
tissue harvesting, and his daughter, the Rev. Susan Cooke Kittredge, said
she had never given permission. "I am surprised by how upset I am," said
Kittredge, who said she favors organ donation. "You wanted to remember your
loved one in the fullness of life. But I've lived with the image of his
cadaver pressed against my face now for a month. You have lives torn
asunder, and I hope the people responsible for these desecrations get their
comeuppance."

© 2006 The Washington Post Company



TOP

Our neighbor in the Great White North has elected a "Conservative" Party
prime minister, Stephen Harper, for the first time in years. The
Conservative Party was formed from a merger in 2003 and gets most of its
support from western Canada (where Canada's economy still works). This time
the corruption of the Liberal Party was so widespread that the Conservatives
even drew support from out east.

While much of the press regards the new PM as a strict right-winger, he
supports a ban on handguns, legislative caps on smog-causing pollutants,
mandated "renewable" content in gasoline, increased farm-support money and
abortion. Canada is not much of a federalized system (but then, neither is
the U.S. any more), so decisions are made centrally. Oh well, at least the
new guy will spend less time bashing us evil Americans, eh?

From:
27 January 2006
Patriot Post No. 06-04
Digest

TOP

Standing on Guard

Post Election Update – January 27th, 2006

A New Day for Canada !

Dear Pro Marriage Friend:

This past Monday was truly an historic and very significant step towards real and dynamic change in the political and cultural climate of our nation. It’s been described quite well as the early dawn of a new day for Canada .

The very narrow victory serves to underscore the intensity of battle for the soul of our nation.

In practical terms Canada switched from being governed by the most anti-moral/anti-religious leadership in our history to what many describe as the most pro-family leadership in at least two generations. Some very good people have been promoted to primary leadership in our nation.

The election of this minority government is an important step towards a new course of direction for our nation. IF handled with wisdom and patience, it can become a stepping stone to a much bigger breakthrough in the very near future.

Our expectation of what this government can achieve must be realistic : you can not undo the damage of 30 years of anti-family legislation in a single mandate, especially in a minority government. It takes time to turn a big ship.

On the other hand : our new Prime Minister is a man who respects the role of religion in society (also a practicing Christian), a family man and a leader genuinely committed to restoring moral and democratic integrity to our nation. In Canada, the Prime Minister has a great deal of power/responsibility including appointments of Cabinet, Senators, Ambassadors, Judges and countless other powerful administrative and legal entities that impact every aspect of our society.

On the marriage issue: We are still a few votes short of being able to reverse Bill C-38. Unfortunately, we made great gains in some places while losing some in others. We moved forward by about 20 and backwards by about 10, which means we’re a few votes short of where we need to be. But there are a significant number of persuadable MPs who are now free to vote their conscience.

IMPORTANT NEWS: www.VoteMarriageCanada.ca under the leadership of former MP, Pat O’Brien will continue to build relationships with MPs and help develop multi-party consensus/support to restore the definition of marriage. In fact, Pat O’Brien has committed, with the support of others, to work full time on this effort towards a winning vote to restore marriage.

OTHER ITEMS OF NOTE:

- The Lord reminded me of how great victories are often won - one step at a time. In fact when Israel took possession of the Promised Land (Exo. 23) the Lord specifically spoke to Joshua about the process; that He would not give them the land in one year but that He would give them new territory as the capacity of his people to occupy the land increased. I believe God is saying something similar to us right now – our goal must be to activate people of faith in every part of Canada including the three big cities (Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver) and in every region (Atlantic Canada, Quebec and the North) as well as amongst every people group (most notably our youth and our aboriginal brothers and sisters)

- Be encouraged and grateful that God is answering prayer: Let there be no doubt, the prayers of God’s people and the pro-marriage campaign efforts did make a huge difference. Without that effort it is very likely that the Liberals would have managed yet another minority government. *** Where the faith community put in a concerted effort to Get Out The Vote for a pro-marriage candidate and where the race was reasonably close, the pro-marriage voters made a difference. Case in point, the re-election of pro-marriage MPs in Regina, parts of BC, and Southwest Ontario, the defeat of Anne McClellan in Edmonton and the defeat of Reg Alcock in Winnipeg, the election of David Sweet in Ancaster (Ontario), the election of new pro-marriage MPs in Quebec and Atlantic Canada etc. While the numbers of victories seem small, without those numbers we would not have a new Prime Minister.

- Of special interest for many of you a ‘prophetic word’ shared by Dick Dewert of the Miracle Channel – just before the election was called. It confirms that this election is (by God’s grace) a stepping stone towards a much bigger change in the future of our nation. Take the time to hear this:

To View: Please right click and save to hard drive:

http://www.miraclechannel.ca/files/video/electionProphecy.wmv

It’s the early dawn of a new day – as we stay humble and faithful God will grant us victory in the coming days for a truly good government that will be a blessing to all.

Roy J. Beyer

Pro-Marriage Network

PS- I will keep you posted from time to time

Roy Beyer (204) 295-4416

Pro-Marriage Network

TOP

Greetings from LifeIssues.net (www.lifeissues.net)

UN Admission, Compares Abortion To "Torture". The Committee on the Elimination of Discrimanation Against Woman (CEDAW) in its recent thirty-third session, began its meeting with the same tired charges against Ireland and other countries for not acknowledging women's right to abortion. But Kriztina Morval of Hungary spoke, "One thing that is lost in this debate is that abortion is bad for women. No woman wants to have an abortion. We have the illusion that women have free choice, but abortion is terribly damaging psychologically, spiritually and physically." She went ahead to say that she hopes one day "abortion will be a thing of the past and considered like torture in the field of human rights." She then focused on the responsibility of men, explaining that the majority of women choose abortion because their partners did not support their pregnancy. Talk about a breath of fresh air. Thank you Kriztina Morval.

RU486 Deaths Explained. Why have five women died recently from sepsis after taking the abortion drug RU486? The drug company, Danco, denies any relationship. The US Food and Drug Administration says they are. But now we have a very clear explanation in the September issue of the Annuals of Pharmacotherapy, by Dr. R. Miech of Brown University. He has shown that the anti-progesterone affects of RU486 cause changes in the cervix. These allow a common vaginal bacteria, C. Sordellii, to enter the uterus. This germ quote, "thrives in this low oxygen environment and derives nutrition from the decaying fetal tissue." He explains that, in the meantime, the drug has an anti-glucocorticoid action that prevents the women's immune system from fighting off the bacteria, "and in fact may help it spread. This combination can result in septic shock, the kind that these women died of." Three of the five women who died had this bacteria in their bodies. According to Dr. B. Miech, such infection
s are "rare outside of RU486 use." They are particularly dangerous because women do not show many symptoms until it is too late. This very clear explanation of the dynamics of how septic shock occurs sounds extremely convincing. This is yet one more reason why this combination of drugs must be taken off of the market before more women and babies die.

God Bless,
Fr. Jerry, omi

.

QUOTE: "Scientific theories that try to explain away the appearance of design as the result of 'chance and necessity' are not scientific at all." - Christoph Schonborn

.

****************************************

Lifeissues.net NEWSLETTER #258

January 15, 2006

****************************************

.

(TABLE OF CONTENTS):

1. Grieving raw 13 years after abortion

2. Archbishop Slams Attempt to Legalize Abortion In Jamaica

3. Using religion to prevent AIDS

4. Delhi's nearly 40% population at risk of contracting HIV/AIDS

5. Screening IVF Babies For Defects Poised to Leap to Whole New Level

6. Look into umbilical cord stem cell research

7. More Women Report Same-Sex Experience, at Younger Age

8. Philippines Bill Mandates Only Two Children, May Force Abortions

9. 500,000 Girls Aborted Per Year in India new Study Finds

10. Human Cloning, Embryonic Stem Cell Research Exploits Women

11. Animal eggs 'to grow stem cells'

12. Screening for Down syndrome

******************************************************* .

("NEW" ARTICLES POSTED RECENTLY at http://www.lifeissues.net)

--Emmanuel McCarthy: http://www.lifeissues.net/writer.php?ID=mcca

--Antonio P. Pueyo: http://www.lifeissues.net/writer.php?ID=pue

--Ron Rolheiser: http://www.lifeissues.net/writer.php?ID=ron

--Frank Enderle: http://www.lifeissues.net/writer.php?ID=end

--Dianne N. Irving: http://www.lifeissues.net/writer.php?ID=irv

--Jameson Taylor: http://www.lifeissues.net/writer.php?ID=tay

--John B. Shea: http://www.lifeissues.net/writer.php?ID=she

--Steven Mosher: http://www.lifeissues.net/writer.php?ID=mos

***********

(Website: Babies For Life Foundation) http://www.babiesforlife.org/index2.asp. Please visit the Babies for Life Foundation's web site to learn about ethical ways of using stem cells from cord blood.

*******************************************************

ITEM #1. Grieving raw 13 years after abortion

A Canterbury woman has spoken out about her experience of abortion, following the release this week of research showing a higher level of mental ill-health among women who had terminations.

Maria Parsons, who had an abortion 13 years ago, is now fighting for a change to the way the law is applied.

She said she still cries every day for the unborn child she agreed to "kill".

At a vulnerable stage in her life, she says, she naively opted for an abortion after an unplanned pregnancy in the dying stages of a relationship.

"It has destroyed the last part of my life. Inside, there is just a longing to hold the baby and to see that 13-year-old standing here. I wonder what she looks like.

"I can see those years in my mind like a photo album," a sobbing Ms Parsons told the Weekend Herald.

Read entire article at The New Zealand Herald:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/section/story.cfm?c_id=1&ObjectID=10362733

-----------------------------------------

ITEM #2. Archbishop Slams Attempt to Legalize Abortion In Jamaica

The Roman Catholic Archbishop of Kingston Lawrence Burke has come down heavily on Jamaica's attempts to legalize abortions. The Jamaican government had called for consultations on the matter and the consultation period is nearing its end.

It is thought that there will be certain liberal standards proposed on the delicate issue of abortions and naturally the Catholic Church is upset about this. "Prosecute the persons who do illegal abortions and shut them down. If a person wants an illegal abortion, it is public knowledge where they are done," said Archbishop Burke, "so prosecute those people and that will decrease the maternal mortality rate." In an interview with the Sunday Observer, Burke said that there was no need to change the laws. The Medical Association of Jamaica (MAJ) is in favor of amending the existing laws and claim that this can bring down the maternal mortality rate, which is fairly high in the island. In Jamaica, abortions are illegal, but a host of quacks and other "abortion" doctors carry on operating with impunity in unhygienic conditions.

View full article at medindia.net:
http://www.medindia.net/news/view_news_main.asp?x=6917

-----------------------------------------

ITEM #3. Using religion to prevent AIDS

The International Inter-Faith Conference on Prevention and Control of AIDS would be held at Indian Institute of Technology, on 7 and 8 January, targeting various religious organisations to throw light on HIV/AIDS and insisting on the need for them to take initiatives to prevent the disease.

Speaking to media persons in the city yesterday,Tomy K, Bel Air Hospital, Panchgani, and also the secretary general of the organising committee, said they would initiate dialogues with faith leaders of different religions in the State for their partnership in efforts for prevention and control of HIV/AIDS.

He said that 85 per cent of this killing disease spread through sexual intercourse and so it was the need of the hour to speak about it openly. 'Religious leaders could do much in preventing the disease because they have more followers behind them. Making them to speak about this disease will definitely have better impact', he added.

View full text at News Today:
http://newstodaynet.com/06jan/rf9.htm

-----------------------------------------

ITEM #4. Delhi's nearly 40% population at risk of contracting HIV/AIDS

Even as Delhi's rapidly growing population becomes a cause of serious concern, nearly 40 per cent of its people are at risk of contracting HIV/AIDS.

According to a Delhi State AIDS Control Society report Delhi's population, nearly half of which is due to migration, presents a unique challenge in the struggle against HIV/AIDS.

"The slum population, 40 per cent of the total, poses a special problem.... The slum population, characterised by low levels of literacy, poor health conditions, poverty, and low status of women, offered HIV many opportunities to spread," the society said in its report 'HIV/AIDS in Delhi - Meeting the Challenge'.

The migratory population, nine lakh and growing, often arrived in the city with little or no HIV knowledge also added to the risk factor, it said.

"Since Delhi is a major crossroad in India it has become an important hub for trucks and transportation," it added.

View article at WebIndia123.com:
http://news.webindia123.com/news/showdetails.asp?id=213364&cat=Health

-----------------------------------------

ITEM #5. Screening IVF Babies For Defects Poised to Leap to Whole New Level

Screening unborn babies for birth defects is poised to leap to a whole new level. Research by British scientists suggests it will soon be possible to screen human embryos for thousands of genetic disorders.

In most cases, current screening techniques are carried out on babies conceived through in vitro fertilization (IVF), before the child is implanted in the womb. In such cases, a child carrying a recognized genetic disorder is "discarded."

The new procedure builds upon existing methods of testing babies, conceived in vitro, for disease before they are implanted in the womb. These advances in genetic screening are limited to children conceived through IVF techniques.

A study issued by the U.S. Center for Disease Control (CDC) shows improved estimates of birth defect frequencies in the U.S. population. The study has provided more accurate estimates of the rates of 18 major birth defects.

While the study states that the purpose of improving estimate accuracy is to help prevent birth defects, in fact pre-natal screening for disorders usually results in death by abortion for the children who are identified with the potential to develop a particular disease. In the U.S. 90% of all children with Down's syndrome are aborted. In Canada the number is 85%.

View full text at LifeSiteNews.com:
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2006/jan/06010606.html

-----------------------------------------

ITEM #6. Look into umbilical cord stem cell research

When it comes to cloning, all anyone can talk about lately -- and understandably so -- is recently disgraced South Korean scientist Hwang Woo-suk. One of "Time" magazine's most influential people of 2004 could prove to be one of the most influential people of 2006, too -- but in ways he never intended.

Hwang, whose cloning claims have been unraveling in recent weeks, has been exposed as a liar. At first, he delusionally thought he could save himself from public disgrace, trying to talk his way out of revelations about unethical egg-procurement practices. But soon we learned that he faked research, too -- even though he tried to claim innocence and cry sabotage. And before 2005's end we learned that in his most celebrated "success," Mr. Stem Cell had never, in fact, created any embryonic stem cells from cloned embryos.

This is actually good news in one sense. Cloning -- even under frequently used euphemisms: somatic cell nuclear transfer, therapeutic cloning, and simply "stem cell research" -- would be a giant leap for mankind, and not a good one. To create a life in order to destroy it, as so-called therapeutic cloning would do, is a brave new world for us. A world that, although some states even here have already invested money in pursuing, we have not quite arrived at. Phew.

View full article at TimesUnion.com [New York]:
http://www.timesunion.com/AspStories/story.asp?storyID=437166&category=OPINION&newsdate=1/9/2006

-----------------------------------------

ITEM #7. More Women Report Same-Sex Experience, at Younger Age

(LifeSiteNews.com) - More women are experimenting with homosexuality, and doing so at a younger age, according to a new report released by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in September 2005.

The report, based on results from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth, found that 11% of women age 18-29 reported having a same-sex experience within the past year of the study. In a 1992 survey, only 4% of women in the same age category indicated same-sex experimentation.

10% of women questioned in the study said they were attracted "mostly" to men, opposed to 86% who indicated they were attracted only to men. In the 1992 survey, only 3% of women said they were attracted "mostly" to men.

Researchers were surprised to discover that women in an older age category, 30-44, only reported about 10% same-sex experience in the past year. Dr. William Mosher, lead researcher, said the high number for younger women was significant because results of questions about life experiences are generally higher for older subjects than younger ones. (NARTH)

The researchers said the higher number for younger women reflected a more common experience of homosexual activity during college. The survey indicated that those who reported sexual activity with members of the same sex did not necessarily identity themselves as "homosexual."

The report also indicated an increase in male homosexual activity for young men, although the increase was much less than that of the women. Six percent of men in the similar age range said they had a same-sex experience, up from 4.9 percent in 1992. 2.3 percent of men surveyed indicated they would call themselves homosexual.

The data were based on 12,571 in-person interviews with men and women 15-44 years of age.

-----------------------------------------

ITEM #8. Philippines Bill Mandates Only Two Children, May Force Abortions

Pro-life advocates in the Philippines are greatly concerned about legislation coming up for a vote there later this month that would implement a rule prohibiting familles from having more than two children. The idea conjures up images for forced abortions and sterilizations that occur in China.

Just before Christmas, a bill was introduced in the Philippine legislature which, if passed, will impose a two-child limit on families. A final vote is expected on January 16.

Eileen Macapanas Cosby, Executive Director of the Filipino Family Fund, is outraged.

She said the bill will "pave the way for the kind of human rights nightmare that is already in China, with its coercive sterilization and contraception practices."

"This Philippine version is really just 'China-light.' This is not a policy growing from Filipino values, it is social engineering from the outside being imposed on the Philippine people," she said.

View full text at LifeNews.com:
http://www.lifenews.com/nat1960.html

-----------------------------------------

ITEM #9. 500,000 Girls Aborted Per Year in India new Study Finds

A study published in the leading British Medical Journal, the Lancet, says sex-targeted abortion is accountable for the deaths of up to half a million girl babies a year and is creating in India, as in China, a severe demographic imbalance in the population.

The study examined data from 134,000 births in 1997 among 6 million people living in 1.1 million households in India. The researchers found that in 1997, between 590,000 and 740,000 girls were aborted in India.

In 2001, the data showed that for every 1,000 male babies born in India, there were just 933 girls. The imbalance is even more pronounced in second births where the preceding children are girls; in those cases, the ratio of girls to boys in second births was 759 to 1,000. When two preceding children were both girls, the numbers fell to 719 girls to 1,000 boys.

Source: LifeSiteNews.com
http://www.lifeissues.net/news.php?newsID=00013717&topic=

-----------------------------------------

ITEM #10. Human Cloning, Embryonic Stem Cell Research Exploits Women

Junior scientist Park Eul-soon suffered the most personally devastating blunder of her career when in 2003 she accidentally spilled a dish of human eggs while conducting experiments in the South Korean lab of then-clone king Hwang Woo-suk.

For that mishap, Hwang coerced Park, a subordinate Ph.D. student in her mid-20s, to replace the lost eggs with her own. After first saying no, Park relented for fear Hwang would otherwise exclude her from academic recognition for her work.

Afterward, according to Korean MBC TV, Park morbidly "went back to Hwang's laboratory and conducted the cloning experiment on the eggs that she herself had contributed that morning."

Park wrote in an e-mail to MBC, "I hope I can forgive myself for not being able to stand up to the professor."

The unforgivable one is Hwang. Not only is he now accused of falsifying his cloning feats and thereby "perpetrat[ing] the greatest scientific fraud, not just of 2005, but of the admittedly still young 21st century," according to MSNBC columnist Arthur Caplan, he is also accused of exploiting women on just as grand a scale to obtain eggs for his cloning experiments.

View full text at LifeSiteNews.com:
http://www.lifenews.com/bio1273.html

-----------------------------------------

ITEM #11. Animal eggs 'to grow stem cells'

Stem cell researchers are looking to use animal eggs as 'hosts' to grow human cells

A Chinese team has already claimed to have created human embryonic stem cells using rabbit eggs which had had their genetic material removed.

UK experts said the option had to be considered because there were too few human eggs for research.

Scientists say cells created using animal eggs would only be used in the lab, but critics condemned the plan.

*****

[Note: You know, scientists need to really get a grip on their own field - as required before doing any research by both the Declaration of Helsinki and the Nuremberg Code. Not just "ethically", but also intellectually, things have really gotten out of control. Aside from the other "key problems" of creating and then killing innocent human beings for research fodder and victimizing women for their "eggs", what about the mitochondrial DNA from the rabbit "host"?? If it was ultimately the DNA fingerprinting for both the nuclear DNA and the mitochondrial DNA involved in nuclear transfer that brought Hwang down and empirically demonstrated his scientific fraud, how and why do these other "stem cell researchers" continue to totally and utterly ignore the reality of foreign mitochondrial DNA present in "stem cells" that will be "therapeutically" injected into potentially millions of desperate vulnerable human patients in global clinical trials - causing severe immune rejection reac
tions? Even if Hwang had succeeded in producing such "stem cells" for "therapies", wouldn't his scientific deception be exposed anyway once these trusting patients began to suffer their demonstrable in-the-flesh consequences? And if it is just to "study" various diseases in vitro, what kind of reliable "scientific knowledge" would that really yield? Think about it. That in vitro mix also contains foreign animal mitochondrial DNA - genetic material that is especially involved in a host of very sophisticated biochemical reactions, many of which are still not scientifically understood to this day. It is also missing the human mitochondrial DNA - which functions significantly differently than animal mitochondrial DNA. So how could such research really yield significant "scientific knowledge" to produce applications in real human patients? And couldn't some of those rabbit genes "accidentally" cross-over into the nuclear DNA of the human donor cell? What about viral DNA or RNA genetic "artifacts"? Etc. Etc. Even aside from all of the multiple ethical and scientific dilemmas - what a horrendous waste of money. - Dianne N Irving, Ph.D.]

*****

Read entire article at BBC News:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4605926.stm

-----------------------------------------

ITEM #12. Screening for Down syndrome

A series of research articles in the most recent edition of Obstetrics and Gynecology makes it clear that "abnormal" preborn children are unacceptable. Arguing that "if the patient desires voluntary termination of pregnancy, the procedure can be performed early in gestation," the article focuses on educating doctors so that such choices can be made earlier. A second article affirms this by pointing out that a physician's job is "to inform couples in a nonjudgmental manner of the available options."

COMMENT: No wonder that columnist Julia Gorin writes, "In America we don't leave infants with disabilities on the side of the road or bury them in the desert. We simply get rid of them before they are born."

Reading: "Screening for Down syndrome," Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1/1/06, http://www.greenjournal.org/cgi/content/abstract/107/1/11;

"Incorporating first-trimester down syndrome studies into prenatal testing," Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1/1/06, http://www.greenjournal.org/cgi/content/abstract/107/1/167;

"Progressives killed Corky," Jewish World Review, 1/5/06, http://www.jewishworldreview.com/julia/gorin010506.php3
.

*********************************************************** ***********************************************************

ACTION:

1. pray that all may have the courage to be God's presence in society and support those who have been deemed "unworthy of life".

2. stay informed at Lifeissues.net website: http://www.lifeissues.net.

3. all past issues of LifeIssues.net Newsletter available online. Click here: http://lifeissues.net/newsletters/mojo.cgi?flavor=archive&list=lifenews&start=0. (These newsletters are an extension of the Website.)

---------------------------------

Assistance:

Please consider financially helping our work to spread the Life Issues message, Thank you:

Donation may be sent directly to:

Fr. Jerry Novotny OMI,
LifeIssues.net, Editor,
Akebono-cho 1-15-9,
Kochi City, Japan, 780-8072.

---------------------------------

Contact Editor:

Jerry Novotny OMI,
Akebono-cho 1-15-9,
Kochi City, Japan, 780-8072;

[tel/fax: 088-843-0406];

email: jerry@lifeissues.net

---------------------------------

Websites by Editor:

English site: http://www.lifeissues.net,

Japanese site: http://www.japan-lifeissues.net,

OMI site: http://www.omijapankorea.net/index.html

-------------------------------


To unsubscribe from: Lifeissues.net Newsletter, just follow this link:

http://lifeissues.net/newsletters/mojo.cgi?f=u&l=lifenews&e=h.wills@ns.sympatico.ca&p=7675

Click this link, or copy and paste the address into your browser.


TOP

==================================================
ZENIT News Agency, The World Seen from Rome
==================================================

Time to Defuse a Demographic Bomb
Concern Is Now About Population Decline

SOFIA, Bulgaria, JAN. 21, 2006 (Zenit.org).- A number of countries have published data revealing a serious deficiency in the number of children being born. On Jan. 9 a report by the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences predicted that the country\'s population will fall from 8 million in 2001 to 7 million in 2020, according to Agence France-Presse.

If the current number of children being born per woman, 1.2 to 1.3, were to continue in coming decades the population could even drop to 4.5 million by 2050. Some European countries have seen birthrates increase. But others, such as Spain and Italy, are at the same level as Bulgaria.

Italy has seen a slight rise in its birthrate in the last couple of years, but the situation is still grave. According to official data, reported in the newspaper Corriere della Sera last Oct. 21, the average age of men when their first child is born is now 33. The average age for first-time fathers in Spain and France is 30 to 31.

Moreover, 40% of Italian men ages 30 to 34 still live at home with mom; the comparable figure for women is 20%.

The effects on the age structure of Italy\'s population are becoming ever more evident. On Nov. 4 Reuters reported that the ratio of those 65 years of age and over to those under 15 reached 137.7 to 100 in 2004. Other European countries -- Germany, Spain, Portugal and Greece -- also have more over-65\'s than under-15\'s, but the disequilibrium is not as severe.

Russia also has serious problems. The British newspaper Guardian reported Dec. 29 that a combination of high mortality (especially for men), lots of abortions and few births has led to an almost 7% drop in Russia\'s population in the last 15 years. Now at 143 million, it is predicted to drop by up to 20 million in the next two decades.

The Guardian cited a report by a business lobby group, Delovaya Rossiya, warning that the country will lose up to $400 billion in the next 20 years if it fails to tackle the population implosion.

\"The deficit of labor is already being noticed,\" said Andrei Korovkin, a labor resources expert. \"Even with a pessimistic view of economic growth, by 2010 it will become the most serious fact limiting the development of Russian industry.\"

Japan shrinking

Just before Christmas Japan announced that for the first time on record its population dropped. A Health Ministry survey showed deaths outnumbering births in 2005 by 10,000, the Associated Press reported Dec. 21. The current average number of children per woman, 1.29, is also at a record low.

Just prior to the publication of the statistics a government report warned that Japan\'s population could shrink by half by the end of the century, Reuters reported Dec. 16.

\"Compared with nations that have recently boosted their birthrates, such as France and Sweden, we cannot say that our nation\'s policies are really sufficient,\" the report said.

In South Korea, government officials are also worried about the lack of children. In fact, after decades of promoting birth control South Korea and other Asian countries are now trying to persuade parents to have more children, the New York Times reported Aug. 21.

\"In the next two or three years, we won\'t be able to increase the birthrate,\" said Park Ha Jeong, a director general in the Health Ministry. \"But we have to stop the decline, or it will be too late.\"

The average number of children per woman in South Korea has plummeted to 1.19. Taiwan is not much better, at 1.22.

Not until last year did the South Korean government commit itself to raising the birthrate. \"We should have started these policies in the late 1990s,\" Park said, \"but we had been focused on decreasing the birthrate for 40 years and it was hard to change directions.\" It remains to be seen how much success the government will have in reversing fertility trends.

Aging trends

The population is also aging rapidly in Canada, announced the official body Statistics Canada. The number of people aged 65 and over will overtake those under 15 by 2015, the Globe and Mail newspaper reported Dec. 15.

By 2031, the number of seniors is expected to be 8.9 million to 9.4 million, almost 25% of the population compared with 13% now. The number of children, by contrast, is projected to be 4.8 million to 6.6 million. At the same time, the number of people of working age (15 to 64) will decline from the current 70% to about 60% in the years after 2030.

In the United States, the population is also aging. A Washington Times report Dec. 26 noted that the first of 78.2 million baby boomers, defined as those born from 1946 to 1964, are about to turn 60. And over the next 25 years the whole country will start to have an age structure like that of Florida, where 20% of the population is 65 or older.

This change presents serious challenges for welfare programs and government finances. The number of people receiving Social Security or Medicare will grow by 27 million in the next two decades, while those working, and paying taxes to finance these benefits, will grow by only 18 million.

Economic impact

\"On the path that we\'re headed on today,\" said David Walker, head of the Government Accountability Office, a federal agency, \"either there have to be dramatic changes in entitlement programs and other federal spending, or dramatic tax increases to close the fiscal gap.\"

In fact, over the next half-century health and welfare benefits could reach a combined level of around 24% of gross domestic product, which is about equivalent to the entire amount of federal government spending in all sectors currently.

Aging costs were also examined recently by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. An OECD study warned that global economic growth will decline to about 1.7% a year over the next three decades, the Financial Times reported Oct. 11. That growth rate would represent a fall of 30% compared with past decades, unless older people are encouraged to work longer to offset declining birthrates.

By 2050 there will be an average of more than seven older, inactive people supported by just 10 active workers in developed economies, compared with a ratio of four to 10 in 2000. In Europe the ratio will be one to one.

Faced with these facts some erstwhile supporters of family planning have recognized their errors. Adam Werbach, former national president of the Sierra Club in the United States, published an article Oct. 5 on the Web site American Prospect Online admitting that population control policies were a mistake.

In recent years a group within the Sierra Club attempted to adopt policies against immigration, a move successfully resisted by Werbach and others. \"In the population-control frame, the number of people and their placement on the planet is the root problem that needs to be solved,\" he explained.

But, Werbach continued, this is not the key problem. He called upon \"population activists\" to change course and concentrate instead on working for improvements in conditions for women, and better health care and education. Instead of worrying about population control we need to unleash human potential, Werbach explained. A lesson many countries are only starting to learn as they face population decline.

ZE06012106

===================================================
ZENIT is an International News Agency.

To receive ZENIT News Services by e-mail, FREE Subscription at:
http://www.zenit.org/english/subscribe.html

For reprint permission, please contact infoenglish@zenit.org.
Visit our web page at http://www.zenit.org/

SEND US YOUR NEWS:
Please send press releases, statements and other information to our international news desk at:
news@zenit.org.
Copyright (c) - Innovative Media, Inc.
===================================================

You can send this news to a friend at the following link:
http://www.zenit.org/english/send_friend/forward_amico.phtml?mittente=h.wills@ns.sympatico.ca&sid=83171


TOP

 

LifeSiteNews.com - Monday January 23, 2006

Conservative Candidate Physically Threatens, Harasses Family Handing Out Pro-Life Election Sheet at Church
Audio Caught on Tape

By John-Henry Westen

SCARBOROUGH, ON, January 23, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) - At about 11:30 a.m. Sunday, the day prior to the federal election, Conservative candidate for Scarborough South West (SSW) Vincent Veerasuntharam (VV) and campaign workers verbally harassed and physically threatened a family who were distributing a pro-life candidate evaluation sheet outside Our Lady of Fatima Shrine Catholic Church in Scarborough.

The family in question was that of LifeSiteNews.com director Steve Jalsevac, who warned the candidate he was recording the incident.

Jalsevac, his wife and four children aged 11-16 were handing out pro-life candidate evaluation sheets compiled by Campaign Life Coalition which detailed information on candidates in the three ridings in which parishioners of the Church reside. The sheet endorsed a Conservative in one, a Liberal in another and no candidate in the third. (See the sheet here: http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2006_docs/evaluationletter.pdf )

In the SSW riding, the sheet endorsed pro-life Liberal MP Tom Wappel since VV refused to respond to the CLC questionnaire. On VV the sheet stated: "Vincent Veerasuntharam, the CPC candidate and his campaign team, have consistently declined to publicly commit his campaign to defending the preborn, sick, aged or traditional marriage through not answering the Campaign Life Coalition questionnaire."

After objecting vehemently to the sheet's evaluation, the candidate took a swing at Jalsevac but stopped short of connecting as Jalsevac withdrew to avoid the blow. On the tape during the physical threat, the candidate can be heard at the time saying, "what are you finding so funny, you want me to, you want me to f..ah, go into jail, I don't mind, because you are sucking up to Tom Wappel. You know Tom Wappel is the biggest, cunning bastard. Tom Wappel is the biggest bastard in the planet." (Listen to the clip here:
Real Media Format
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/audio/swingatsj.rm
Quicktime mp3 format
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/audio/swingatsj.mp3 )

When warned that the exchange was being recorded, the candidate initially said he did not care. On the tape Jalsevac can be heard stating: "Whatever you are saying right now will be recorded." VV can be heard responding: "It doesn't matter, record it. Tom Wappel is the biggest hypocrite, Tom Wappel is the biggest crook." (Hear that exchange here:
Real Media Format
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/audio/recordit.rm
Quicktime mp3 format
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/audio/recordit.mp3 )

However, later in the incident VV's campaign workers can be heard on the tape forcibly attempting to take the recorder away from Jalsevac. As the workers attempted to physically remove the recorder one can be clearly heard on the tape saying, "Take this recorder off his hands." (Listen to the clip:
Real Media format
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/audio/takerecorder.rm
Quicktime format
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/audio/takerecorder.mp3 )

The incident was witnessed by at least several parishioners as it occurred at the top of the Church's front steps after a Mass as the church was emptying. When police from 41 Division arrived, witnesses described the events and Mr. Jalsevac said he wanted to press charges against VV and the campaign workers accompanying him.

41 Division night staff sergeant Patterson told LifeSiteNews.com that a unit had been dispatched to the church earlier today but only the day shift could provide more details of the event.

Jalsevac told LifeSiteNews.com he is seeking to press charges over the altercation. Jalsevac says that as the workers shoved him he was forced back into his wife, knocking her to the ground. At this point, he relates, his sixteen-year-old son ran to assist and he too was shoved by one of the campaign workers.

Developing . . .
Back to Top | Email to a Friend

(c) Copyright: LifeSiteNews.com, a production of Interim Publishing.
Permission to republish granted but acknowledgement of source (use LifeSiteNews.com) is *REQUIRED*

Comments, questions, or news tips: lsn@lifesitenews.com
Search LifeSite - http://www.lifesitenews.com/search/
Subscribe - http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/subscribe/
Unsubscribe - http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/unsubscribe/
Change subscription information - http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/subscribe/update/
Subscribe friends - http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/subscribe/gift/

Donate to LifeSiteNews.com at http://www.lifesitenews.com/contribute/

TOP




Remarks by President Bush in a Telephone Call to the March for Life Participants

WASHINGTON, Jan. 23 /Christian Newswire/ -- The following transcript is of remarks by President Bush in a telephone call to the March for Life participants :

12:40 P.M. EST

THE PRESIDENT: Nellie, thank you very much. I appreciate the invitation to speak. I'm calling from Manhattan, Kansas. (Applause.) Sounds like you got some good folks from Kansas there. (Applause.) I want to thank everybody there -- if you're from Kansas, or anywhere else in our country, for your devotion to such a noble cause.

You believe, as I do, that every human life has value, that the strong have a duty to protect the weak, and that the self-evident truths of the Declaration of Independence apply to everyone, not just to those considered healthy or wanted or convenient. These principles call us to defend the sick and the dying, persons with disabilities and birth defects, all who are weak and vulnerable, especially unborn children. (Applause.)

We're making good progress in defending these principles, Nellie, and you and I are working together, along with others, to build what I've called a culture of life. One of my first acts as the President was to ban the use of taxpayer money on programs that promote abortion overseas. (Applause.) I want to thank you all for getting that ban on partial-birth abortion to my desk, a bill I was proud to sign -- (applause) -- and a law which we are going to defend -- and are defending -- vigorously in our courts. Because we acted, infants who are born despite an attempted abortion are now protected by law. Thanks to "Laci and Conner's Law," prosecutors can now charge those who harm or kill a pregnant woman with harming or killing her unborn child, as well. (Applause.)

We're vigorously promoting parental notification laws, adoption, teen abstinence, crisis pregnancy programs, and the vital work of our faith-based groups. We're sending a clear message to any woman facing a crisis pregnancy: We love you, we love your child, and we're here to help you.

There's more work to be done. The House has passed a bill to ensure that state parental involvement laws are not circumvented by those who take minors across state lines to have abortions. And the United States Senate needs to pass this bill so I can sign it into law. (Applause.)

We also must respect human life and dignity when advancing medical science, and we're making progress here, as well. Last month, I signed a pro-life bill supporting ethical treatment and research using stem cells from umbilical cord blood. I also renew my call for Congress to ban all forms of human cloning. Because human life is a gift from our Creator and should never be used as a means to an end, we will not sanction the creation of life only to destroy it.

By changing laws we can change our culture. And your persistence and prayers, Nellie, and the folks there with you, are making a real difference. We, of course, seek common ground where possible; we're working to persuade more of our fellow Americans of the rightness of our cause. And this is a cause that appeals to the conscience of our citizens, and is rooted in America's deepest principles -- and history tells us that with such a cause, we will prevail.

Again, Nellie, thank you for letting me come to speak to you. Tell everybody there that I ask for God's blessings on them and their families, and, of course, may God continue to bless our grand country. (Applause.)

END 12:44 P.M. EST

Christian Newswire
To: National Desk

Contact: White House, Office of the Press Secretary, 202-456-2580

Forward this press release to another reporter or news producer

This email was sent to clcns@clcns.com, by newsdesk@earnedmedia.org
Update Profile/Email Address | Instant removal with SafeUnsubscribe™ | Privacy Policy.

Christian Communication Network | 2020 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW | Washington | DC | 20006


TOP


Conservative Minority government does not guarantee status quo on assisted suicide.

Alex Schadenberg

The Euthanasia Prevention Coalition remains concerned that a bill to legalize euthanasia and/or assisted suicide is still capable of passing through the newly elected parliament, even though the Conservatives have won a minority government.

This is no time to relax and be complacent, the election of a conservative minority may not have changed the configuration of support for euthanasia or assisted suicide enough in order to create a climate where a bill to legalize euthanasia and/or assisted suicide would be defeated in parliament.

Many Conservatives have indicated that they would not support a bill to legalize euthanasia or assisted suicide, but not all of the Conservatives oppose euthanasia and assisted suicide.

Conservative Leader Stephen Harper stated in the french leaders language debate that he opposes assisted suicide and has no intention of raising the issue in parliament. He would, however, allow a free vote on the issue if it were raised in parliament. "I can simply say it isn’t the intention of our government to propose this type of change to the law," Harper said. "I think it’s important to resist the idea of giving the power to kill. I understand the reasons some might want to propose this. If there is a proposal like this in the House of Commons – a moral question – I would always allow my members a free vote."

Bloc Quebecois leader Gilles Duceppe stated in a letter to Alex Schadenberg, Euthanasia Prevention Coalition, Executive Director that: In our view, however, everyone has the right to make decisions about the health care they want to receive, and to expect that their decisions about their own body will be carried out. People should be able to choose freely to die if it is clear to them that they no longer have any quality of life and that their suffering has become intolerable. For some people, prolonging life involves a loss of independence and control, which in turns means a loss of dignity that they cannot accept. We have a moral obligation to respect the preferences of such people, in such circumstances, as to when and how they wish to die.

The Liberal party members are divided. There is a small group of Liberal MP’s who staunchly oppose euthanasia and assisted suicide but the question remains whether there numbers are large enough to ensure that a private members bill to legalize euthanasia and/or assisted suicide would be defeated.

The NDP party position supports the legalization of euthanasia and assisted suicide. There may be a couple of NDP members of parliament who would oppose a bill.

The Euthanasia Prevention Coalition is committed to Caring solutions to end of life issues. We oppose any attempt to weaken the current protection the exists in law for people with disabilities and other vulnerable Canadians. We urge the government to move forward by ensuring every Canadians will receive the necessary supports to enable people to live with dignity and thus mitigate the demand for medical killing.


TOP

Letter to Editor,
Globe & Mail Online Tuesday, Jan 24th, 2006.

Canada needs what Harper and the CPC has promised to implement, improved crime enforcement and performance of the judiciary, to reduce taxes generally, to distribute assistance for childcare to parents not institutions, to reduce wait times for healthcare treatment, to tackle the poverty of provinces versus the federal surpluses, to respect provincial selections of Senators, and to hold free votes on moral issues that arise as private members bills.

Only socialist ideologues would oppose these careful, fair, and reasonable objectives, which brings up these questions, "Why did Paul Martin's Liberals make crime enforcement harder by opening whole new classes of 'protected' species in Canadian human rights law, why did they remove traditional marriage from Canadian law, why did they fail to produce a substantial tax relief after promising it in the 2004 election, why would they propose to legalize marijuana and prostitution, and why would they protect child predators from prosecution for sex with 14 and 15 year-olds?"

The answer is not one most people would like to hear. It is simply this, mega-rich champagne socialists, like the people Paul Martin admires, favour a socialist dominated society because people who accept socialism are easier to control and indoctrinate than are people who have been formed to reflect parental values for themselves and their children. They have different values. Real people have real values, like truth, justice, fairness and compassion for others. Socialists have false values like choice, tolerance, and self-serving compassion.

Paul Martin's values ring hollow because they are shadows of truth, simulated justice, relative fairness and false compassion. His is a pretend world of the favoured few ruling the rest. Most Canadians, however, are descended from those who escaped such a system and they still have enough residual memory to know a phony when they see one.

TOP

Greetings from LifeIssues.net (www.lifeissues.net)

Dear Colleague,

Austin Ruse, Catholic Family & Human Rights Institute, writes that a hard-law negotiation over disability rights just reconvened at UN headquarters in New York. There is a chance that pro-abortion language could be approved in the document. This would be the first time that a hard-law document contained such language.

Of chief concern is the inclusion in Article 25 of language in the latest version of the treaty granting persons with disabilities "the same range and standard of affordable health services as provided other persons, [including sexual and reproductive health services] and population-based public health programme." The phrase "including sexual and reproductive health services" is in brackets in the proposed text because it remains a point of debate among negotiators. Such language has never appeared in a treaty which is binding on all signatories and it is the only health right specifically mentioned in the article.

Pro-abortion groups insist that sexual and reproductive services means abortion, though this has never been agreed to by UN Member States. By placing sexual and reproductive services in the context of rights guaranteed to all citizens, the document could be used to enshrine abortion rights into international law. Pro-abortion activists in signatory countries that restrict abortion may challenge those laws by citing the convention.

Concerns about Article 25's language were raised during the sixth round of negotiations by Patrick Buckley of the London-based Society for the Protection of Unborn Children. Buckley received an unusual rebuke from the Chairman, Don MacKay of New Zealand, who called Buckley's concerns invalid.

Article 10 is also of concern because it deals with the right to life. The article declares "that every human being has the inherent right to life . . ." But what that means and how the international community defines "human being" are unclear. The article does not offer protection to the unborn from being aborted because of a disability and there is nothing insuring the right of the disabled to be protected from euthanasia. Considering the fact the European Union backs this language whole heartedly and that a number of EU nations have legalized euthanasia it is unlikely that this language would prohibit euthanasia otherwise those nations would be unwilling to sign on.

Negotiations over the treaty have been contentious since they started in the middle of 2002. This session is scheduled to conclude February 3 and another session is slated for August. Negotiators hope to complete work by the end of the year.

God Bless,

Fr. Jerry, omi

(ACTION: you may contact Austin Ruse with your concerns and vocal support at c-fam@c-fam.org)

.

QUOTE: "In moral evaluation a distinction must be made between strictly therapeutic manipulation, which aims to cure illnesses caused by genetic or chromosome anomalies (genetic therapy), from manipulation altering the human genetic patrimony. A curative intervention, which is also called 'genetic surgery,' will be considered desirable in principle, provided its purpose is the real promotion of the personal well-being of the individual, without damaging his integrity or worsening his condition of life." -- Charter for Health Care Workers, 12


.

****************************************

Lifeissues.net NEWSLETTER #260

January 29, 2006

****************************************

.

(TABLE OF CONTENTS):

1. Japan: Infertile ground

2. Commentary on the Women's Bioethics Project

3. UK Judge Denies Parents Right to Know About Abortions For Their Underage Daughters

4. Abortion Leads to Substance Abuse for Significant Number of Women

5. Abortion Total in United States Since Roe v. Wade Now Over 47 Million

6. German leaders wake up to shrinking population

7. China warns AIDS spreading among general population

8. Pharmacist speaks out after fired for refusing to dispense emergency birth control

9. A 'loveless society'?

10. The choice no parent ever wants to make

11. S Korea Probes Stem Cell Trials

12. Delaware House Passes Fraudulent Human Cloning 'Ban'

******************************************************* .

("NEW" ARTICLES POSTED RECENTLY at http://www.lifeissues.net)


--John B. Shea: http://www.lifeissues.net/writer.php?ID=she

--Antonio P. Pueyo: http://www.lifeissues.net/writer.php?ID=pue

--Ron Rolheiser: http://www.lifeissues.net/writer.php?ID=ron

--Frank Enderle: http://www.lifeissues.net/writer.php?ID=end

--Dianne N. Irving: http://www.lifeissues.net/writer.php?ID=irv

--Rebecca Taylor: http://www.lifeissues.net/writer.php?ID=tayl

--Theresa Burke: http://www.lifeissues.net/writer.php?ID=bur

--Doug McManaman: http://www.lifeissues.net/writer.php?ID=mcm

--Jameson Taylor: http://www.lifeissues.net/writer.php?ID=tay

***********

[Website: Useless Eaters]: http://www.regent.edu/acad/schedu/uselesseaters/

This is a very interesting and insightful multimedia presentation. It is interesting history and has some very relevant application for today. Specifically it deals with the attitudes towards disability and abnormality in Germany prior to and during Nazi rule that contributed to the events of the Holocaust. Allow your self some serious quiet time to check out this thought provoking website.

*******************************************************

ITEM #1. Japan: Infertile ground

Japan is shrinking. Government figures released in December 2005 indicate that the population of Japan decreased: A report compiled by the Health and Welfare Ministry estimates 1.067 million births in 2005, as compared to 1.077 million deaths. Excluding the war-ravaged year of 1945, this is the nation's first recorded net population loss since records began to be kept in 1899.

Experts predicted in 2002 that the nation's population would peak in 2007. Now, according to The National Institute of Population and Social Security Research, the decline has arrived earlier than expected.

One factor in the accelerated decline is the high number of deaths among elderly who succumbed to an influenza epidemic in early 2005. But all agree that the most significant factor has been the rapid fall of the birthrate. The average number of babies born to a Japanese woman during her reproductive years dropped to a record low of 1.289 in 2004, continuing a downward trend that started in the early 1980s.

View full article at World Magazine:
http://www.worldmag.com/subscriber/displayarticle.cfm?id=11472

-----------------------------------------

ITEM #2. Commentary on the Women's Bioethics Project

A new pro-choice, pro-science think tank called the Women's Bioethics Project, has released a report called, "Bioethics and Public Policy: Conservative Dominance in the Current Landscape." I thought to myself: How is that possible? Do conservatives dominate bioethics public policy? Is that like the mythical "conservative" media bias?

After reading the report, I found that Kathryn Hinsch, the founder of the Women's Bioethics Project, makes a strong case. She contends that conservative groups dominate all areas of bioethics debate (i.e. euthanasia, cloning, stem cell research, abortion, reproductive technologies.) She writes, "To date, only extremely conservative and overtly religious groups have devoted substantial resources to affecting bioethics public policy." She clearly equates any group that is unequivocally pro-life as "extreme." She observes "at the core of bioethics is the ultimate power struggle for the control of life (and death) and our sense of ourselves as human beings." And, in her opinion conservative groups "see bioethics as a way to extend their anti-reproductive freedom, anti-science, pro-religion political agdenda." In addition, conservatives "use bioethics as a way to galvanize their base, gear up the troops for battle, divide progressives, and polish their image."

After several pages of speculating on what drives the conservative agenda, Hinsch finally gets to the real reason that conservatives dominate the bioethics landscape. It is because most conservative groups agree on the idea of human dignity. She writes, [Conservatives] are incredibly adept at tying these [bioethics] issues together in a unified conservative framework based on the concept of 'human dignity.' This defines their position on any given issue and resonates with their audience."

View full commentary at LifeIssues.net:
http://www.lifeissues.net/writers/tayl/tayl_03womenbioethics.html

-----------------------------------------

ITEM #3. UK Judge Denies Parents Right to Know About Abortions For Their Underage Daughters

(LifeSiteNews.com) - UK parents have been told they have no right to know if their daughter is to have an abortion or contraceptive, according to a High Court judgement.

Mr Justice Silber told Sue Axon, who brought the case, that forcing a girl to tell her parents she is having an abortion "may lead her to make a decision that she later regrets or seek the assistance of an unofficial abortionist."

Axon, a mother of five and post-abortion sufferer, said, "Having endured the trauma of abortion, I brought the case to ensure that medical professionals would not carry out an abortion on one of my daughters without first informing me," according to BBC coverage.

I could then discuss such a life-changing event with her and provide the support she would need." Axon said she had no plans for an appeal.

Society for the Protection of Unborn Children (SPUC) said that parents will be confused and angry at Silber's judgment today. SPUC general secretary Paul Tully commented: "Abortion, as well as killing an unborn child, can have long-term physical, social and psychological effects on young women - and this is acknowledged and emphasised by the judge. We believe that the judgment was right to stress these health risks, as well as acknowledging the social, moral, religious and cultural issues at stake."

"However, abortions and abortion-inducing drugs are routinely provided for under-16 year-olds by the Department of Health, flouting the 1985 legal guidelines on provision of contraception and abortion to under-16s that the judge said were valid and of great importance," Tully explained.

"The judgment is written in the assumption that the guidelines are widely known and carefully observed," Tully added. "In effect the judge pays lip-service to the 1985 rules, while ignoring the contempt in which they are held by health officials."

"The demands from the pro-abortion lobby that it should be allowed to provide young teenagers with abortions secretly (keeping GPs as well as parents in the dark) shows how brazen it has become," Tully said. "Mr Silber's judgment will encourage the pro-abortion lobby to become more vehement in its demands. Mr Silber's inclusion of contentious statements, such as the claim that a 'right to abortion' exists in English law, is disturbing. It suggests that his thinking is dominated by those who campaign to create such a right by asserting that it already exists, and ignores Parliament's decision in 1967 to legalise abortion only in specific situations, primarily of risk to the life or health of the pregnant woman."

See related LifeSiteNews.com coverage:
Mother Challenges Teen Abortion, UK Parental Notification Law
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2005/nov/05110806.html

-----------------------------------------

ITEM #4. Abortion Leads to Substance Abuse for Significant Number of Women

(LifeSiteNews.com) -A recent study reinforces previous findings that women who have abortions frequently turn to drugs and alcohol to cope with the aftereffects of the trauma.

Author Pricilla Coleman, professor of Human Development and Family Studies at Bowling Green State University, said studies show women who have abortions are up to five times more likely to use drugs and alcohol, and to smoke, than women who have not had an abortion, in a research review published in Current Women's Health Reviews.

Coleman said studies show women are more likely than men to rely on drugs or alcohol for help in dealing with severe personal trauma, such as physical or sexual abuse, or illness and family dysfunction.

Dr. David Reardon, a post-abortion expert and director of research at the Elliot Institute, an non-profit organization that tracks the impact of abortion, said there are at least 21 studies linking induced abortion and substance abuse, in an Elliot Institute press release.

"Many women who have experienced abortion have unresolved emotional issues related to their abortion," he said. "Substance abuse can provide an easily accessible way to self-medicate their pain and numb their emotions."

Reardon said mental health workers need to recognize the devastating effects of abortion, and find ways of helping women deal with the buried fallout.

"If treatment for substance abuse or other mental health problems fails to address underlying factors such as abortion, the treatment may be ineffective and women are likely to continue to turn to substances such as drugs or alcohol to cope," Reardon said.

Studies have also found significantly higher rates of depression, anxiety disorders, suicidal tendencies, psychiatric hospitalization and poor bonding with and parenting of later children, in women who have had an abortion.

See full report from the Elliot Institute here:
http://www.earnedmedia.org/elliot0121.htm

-----------------------------------------

ITEM #5. Abortion Total in United States Since Roe v. Wade Now Over 47 Million

Sometime during 2005, the United States reached an ugly new milestone: more than 47 million abortions have been performed in the 33 years since the Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade decision that legalized abortion throughout pregnancy for virtually any reason.

The figure comes from analysis from the National Right to Life Committee, based on data from the Alan Guttmacher Institute. AGI, a research group affiliated with Planned Parenthood, compiles what both sides on abortion believe are the most accurate abortion statistics.

While the number of abortions nationwide is on the decline, the total figure of abortions since the landmark 1973 ruling continues to climb and is expected to reach 50 million by 2008.

"It's an unspeakable tragedy," Dr. Randall O'Bannon, director of education and research at National Right to Life, told Baptist Press.

"That [47 million] is higher than the population of some countries. That would be wiping out a number of whole states," he explained.

View full text at LifeNews.com:
http://www.lifenews.com/nat2023.html

-----------------------------------------

ITEM #6. German leaders wake up to shrinking population

Stunning as it may seem, a steep decline in the German population since 1972 and fears the trend will gain pace have led demographers to warn of unsettling consequences.

The number of Germans has declined by 3.2 million -- the population of Berlin -- over the last 30 years but demographers' concerns have mostly been ignored until now in a country scarred by the Nazis' nefarious procreation pressures.

German leaders have now lifted the birth rate to the top of the political agenda for the first time since the Nazi era, and the two ruling parties are trying to outdo each other with pro-family measures.

"Germans are at risk of dying out if the trend continues," said Harald Michel, managing director of the Institute for Applied Demography. He fears the German population could shrink from 75 million to 50 million by 2050 and further after that.

"The birth rates have been below the replacement rate for 35 years -- a lethal development," he added. "Germans could become an 'endangered people.' It's hypothetical now but we may have to think about 'the last German' at some point. The problem is compounded each generation. Children not born 30 years ago obviously aren't there to have children now."

View full article at Reuters:
http://today.reuters.com/News/newsArticle.aspx?type=lifeAndLeisureNews&storyID=2006-01-23T140239Z_01_L17246968_RTRUKOC_0_US-GERMANY-POPULATION.xml

-----------------------------------------

ITEM #7. China warns AIDS spreading among general population

China on Wednesday revised down an estimate of the number of people living in the country with HIV/AIDS, but international health agencies warned that with 70,000 new infections last year, there was no room for complacency. They also warned that the virus was no longer restricted to drug users and those who sold blood, but had begun to spread quickly among the general population.

"China's HIV infections have been linked to high-risk behavior. But now, sex work is moving it toward the general population," WHO China representative Henk Bekedam told reporters at a conference announcing the new figures.

By the end of last year, China had an estimated 650,000 people living with AIDS/HIV, 75,000 of whom had full-blown AIDS, according to the study.

The World Health Organization, China's Ministry of Health and the United Nations' AIDS agency jointly produced the study, an update on an earlier assessment of the AIDS epidemic in China in 2003. Bekedam said that the new estimated infections, roughly 200 a day, showed the situation in China was "more serious than we thought."

Most of the new cases were injecting drug users and sex workers and their clients, but there was a growing number of infected pregnant mothers and spouses of sex workers' clients, the report said. While a ban on the sale of blood in the late 1990s reduced the number of infections through transfusions, Bekedam said unprotected sex was becoming the new means for the virus' spread.

He called for greater HIV/AIDS awareness campaigns in China, and more free testing and treatment for HIV-positive people. China had previously estimated in 2003 that 840,000 people were HIV-positive and 84,000 people had full-blown AIDS.

View full article at newsfromrussia.com:
http://newsfromrussia.com/world/2006/01/25/71730.html

-----------------------------------------

ITEM #8. Pharmacist speaks out after fired for refusing to dispense emergency birth control

A local pharmacist said Tuesday she was fired for her religious beliefs.

"I feel really hurt, because I was always reliable," said Heather Williams. "I loved my job. I did."

Williams is a pharmacist who lost her job not for something she did, but for something she promised never to do - fill a prescription for the Plan B contraceptive or, morning after pill.

Speaking out for the first time, Williams said she was fired last month from a Target pharmacy in St. Charles because of her strong Baptist belief.

"It's moral and religious," Williams said. "I believe life begins with two cells and I don't want to be part of the end of that life."

Williams said her beliefs were no secret for the last five years to Target, but when the company wanted her to sign a letter promising to direct customers to pharmacies dispensing Plan B, she refused.

The new Target policy was prompted by protests from Planned Parenthood.

"A pharmacist's duty is to fill the prescription and fill the legal prescription and it needs to be filled without delay and without judgment." Mary Kogut of Planned Parenthood said.

But Williams is standing up for what she believes is her right, even now planning to file a federal discrimination charge against Target.

View full text at kmov.com:
http://www.kmov.com/localnews/stories/012406cckkKMOVPharmacist.3747ef5a.html

-----------------------------------------

ITEM #9. A 'loveless society'?

While the Supreme Court simply scratched the surface of the debate in opining that the feds can't control narcotics to stop assisted suicide in Oregon, Suzanne Fields digs deeper in deploring the loveless society that "celebrates suicide" (Op-Ed, Monday).

With the elderly today often disdained or discarded by their own families, consider the incentives for a state-sponsored suicide program like Oregon's. Why fritter away an inheritance on expensive end-of-life care? Why care for "useless eaters" who are no longer "productive" to society? Don't the financial and emotional tolls of terminal illness suggest a "duty to die"?

I spent several months conducting research in the Netherlands, which like Oregon has legalized medical killing. I interviewed family members who were still grieving over loved ones lost to state-sponsored euthanasia. In one case, Dutch doctors withheld food and water from a beloved grandfather while administering overdoses of morphine. He had never requested euthanasia. The family discovered the scheme too late, and the grandfather died without goodbyes. Government-sponsored studies reveal that nearly a thousand Dutch patients are terminated by doctors each year without ever having requested euthanasia. Yes, euthanasia and assisted suicide provide autonomy -- but for the doctors, not the patients.

The answer to state sponsored suicide includes more sophisticated and in certain cases, more aggressive, pain-relief prescribing regulations. Hospice care and tools to help alleviate the financial burdens of terminally can also help tremendously. But the most powerful prescription for a terminally ill person is the unwavering love of family and friends and the hope of a life to come in which "there shall no longer be any death; there shall no longer be any mourning, or crying, or pain."

Source: News and Views Jan 24 2006
http://www.washingtontimes.com/op-ed/20060123-093308-7346r.htm

-----------------------------------------

ITEM #10. The choice no parent ever wants to make

The Guardian newspaper has run a strongly pro-abortion article on couples who make the 'agonising decision' to abort their disabled babies. [The Guardian, 26 January] Alison Davis, co-ordinator of the disability rights group No Less Human, criticised the approach taken. "This article concentrates on two such babies, one aborted for spina bifida and the other for heart problems," she explained. "The assumptions about the negative value of these babies lives is truly breathtaking. Having been born with spina bifida and hydrocephalus myself I was appalled to see that the baby with spina bifida was dismissed as 'a child who couldn't be anything.'"

View full text at The Guardian:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/g2/story/0,3604,1694855,00.html

-----------------------------------------

ITEM #11. S Korea Probes Stem Cell Trials

The South Korean government says it is investigating whether abuses took place during clinical trials for stem cell treatments, which critics say exposed desperate patients to unacceptable risks.

The government has been forced to rethink its hands-off approach to cutting-edge stem cell medicine following the fiasco over the cloning pioneer, Hwang Woo-suk, who was found to have fabricated research for his claimed breakthrough on cloned stem cells.

*****************

[Note: The recent probe of the use of human embryonic stem cells as "therapies" in South Korea discussed in the article below should be a very loud wakeup call to all concerned - but especially patients and their families. It would seem that all the protections (such as they are) afforded human subjects in research by the Declaration of Helsinki and the Nuremberg Code went right out the window in these South Korean clinical trials. Could the same disastrous human embryonic stem cell experimental clinical trials happen here?

Just as the public has been required to learn more about stem cell research than they ever wanted to know in order to ferret out the scientific truth, so will they be required to examine, analyze and evaluate at least the recent history of research clinical trials and regulations both here and abroad in order to prevent the same human disasters on a global scale. The same mis-definitions of the science involved in "selling" this research has long been used in certain laws and regulations governing clinical trials. For example, in the United States such clinical trials are required to follow the federal OHRP regulations for the use of human subjects in research (formerly the OPPR federal regulations mandated by the same 1975 National Research Act that mandated the "birth" of bioethics in 1978 - the Belmont Report). Unfortunately these federal regulations scientifically mis-define both "pregnancy" and "fetus" as beginning at implantation. Thus if and when these federal regulati
ons are applied by IRBs in the real world, there is no human embryo (or its stem cells) to consider or to protect as a human subject in vitro or in vivo through 8 weeks of development - since these regulations don't acknowledge their existence. Patients' capacities to give legally valid informed consent to be injected with these embryonic stem cells as "therapies" are thus automatically precluded. (Nor would women who have been impregnated with these embryos be considered pregnant through 8 weeks.) It is also time to hold Congressional hearings on such purely experimental research "therapies" (often bemusingly called "innovative therapies") that are taking place behind closed doors in the privacy of physicians' offices, thus bypassing even the federal regulations. Considering the horrendous "hype" we've already seen just to do the basic research, imagine what the "hype" will be to patients to lure them into invalid, dangerous and premature clinical trials involving human embryonic stem cell "therapies". - Dianne N. Irving, Ph.D.]

*********************

View full text at BBC News:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4639992.stm

-----------------------------------------

ITEM #12. Delaware House Passes Fraudulent Human Cloning 'Ban'

One would think that by now people who are genuinely interested in banning human cloning and who really care about protecting innocent nascent human beings, patient safety, and women's rights would have gotten it right. But apparently not. .. If Delaware politicians don't want to suffer the same ignominies as South Korea's Hwang, they should seek their scientific information elsewhere from more reliable sources. Hopefully the Delaware politicians will think for themselves and pass a true total human cloning ban - protecting vulnerable innocent nascent human beings, human patients and women alike.

View excellent article by Dianne N Irving, Ph.D. at LifeIssues.net:
http://www.lifeissues.net/writers/irv/irv_115delawareban.html

.

*********************************************************** ***********************************************************

ACTION:

1. pray that all may have the courage to be God's presence in society and support those who have been deemed "unworthy of life".

2. stay informed at Lifeissues.net website: http://www.lifeissues.net.

3. all past issues of LifeIssues.net Newsletter available online. Click here: http://lifeissues.net/newsletters/mojo.cgi?flavor=archive&list=lifenews&start=0. (These newsletters are an extension of the Website.)

---------------------------------

Assistance:

Please consider financially helping our work to spread the Life Issues message, Thank you:

Donation may be sent directly to:

Fr. Jerry Novotny OMI,
LifeIssues.net, Editor,
Akebono-cho 1-15-9,
Kochi City, Japan, 780-8072.

---------------------------------

Contact Editor:

Jerry Novotny OMI,
Akebono-cho 1-15-9,
Kochi City, Japan, 780-8072;

[tel/fax: 088-843-0406];

email: jerry@lifeissues.net

---------------------------------

Websites by Editor:

English site: http://www.lifeissues.net,

Japanese site: http://www.japan-lifeissues.net,

OMI site: http://www.omijapankorea.net/index.html

-------------------------------


To unsubscribe from: Lifeissues.net Newsletter, just follow this link:

http://lifeissues.net/newsletters/mojo.cgi?f=u&l=lifenews&e=h.wills@ns.sympatico.ca&p=7675

Click this link, or copy and paste the address into your browser.


TOP

The ACLU Loses Commandments Cases

WASHINGTON, Jan. 4 /Christian Wire Service/ -- The ACLU lost several cases at the end of the year that were not reported by the main stream media. The main stream media is for the ACLU and I guess they don't want to acknowledge any of these ACLU loses.

The plain and simple truth is the ACLU LOST several important cases which were not reported by the main stream media in late 2005.
One of the most important ACLU loses came on December 20, 2005 and involved a Ten Commandments display in Mercer County Kentucky. This case involved the same exact display from the McCreary County Kentucky case that was recently ruled against by the US Supreme Court.

However, the US Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals handed the ACLU a significant defeat when they ruled that this same exact display is CONSTITUTIONAL. The difference between the two cases seems to be that Mercer County always included other historical documents in their display and therefore it was more easily determined to have a secular purpose.

The Court said, "Our concern is that of the reasonable person. And the ACLU, an organization whose mission is to ensure that...the government (is kept) out of the religion business, does not embody the reasonable person." The Courts opinion also rejected the ACLU's "repeated reference to the 'separation of church and state.' This extra- constitutional construct has grown tiresome. The First Amendment does not demand a wall of separation between church and state," the Court said.

"This case represents a huge victory and may signal the beginning of the end of dangerous, ridiculous rulings in favor of the ACLU. Whether the ACLU likes it or not this nation was founded upon the principles of Christianity. We are better off because of the principles taught in the Ten Commandments," said Don Swarthout, President of Christians Reviving America's Values, aka CRAVE. "The problem with the ACLU is that they do not offer anything concrete for us to pattern our lives after. The Ten Commandments are a pretty simple pattern for us to follow," Swarthout said.

Just as important was a case in the US Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals who ruled that the same exact display as the one in the Mercer County Case was CONSTITUTIONAL in Elkhart County, Indiana. After the loss the ACLU has indicated that they will not appeal this case.

On December 2, 2005 the ACLU also lost its case against New York City where they were trying to stop random searches of passenger's bags who were boarding the subway system.

The ACLU had sued the City of New York after they instituted random bag searches on July 22, 2005 following the bombing of London's transit system. The ACLU's contention was that random searches of passenger's bags were an unconstitutional invasion of privacy.

The ACLU seems to favor protecting the rights of terrorists who want to kill law abiding citizens. "The truth is obvious. Terrorists and all others who do not respect the American way of life must be stopped in order to protect the life styles of law abiding American citizens," said Don Swarthout, President of Christians Reviving America's Values.

"The ACLU wants to protect the rights of criminals and terrorists. Why doesn't the ACLU want to protect the rights of law abiding citizens," Swarthout asked?

"The main stream media never talks about these cases where the ACLU loses! They seem to be quick enough to tell us about the cases where they have won, but they will not even mention the many cases where the ACLU loses," Swarthout added.

"We represent a large number of average people from all across America and we are fed up with the unfair treatment we receive from the media and from the ACLU who is a real danger to our nation's well being. Therefore, we have now written to every US Senator asking for an investigation into the activities and agenda of the ACLU. The ACLU was investigated by Congress in 1931 and it is time for that to happen again," Swarthout stated.

Christian Newswire

TOP

Canada In Population Crisis - Seniors To Outnumber Children In A Decade

Despite frightening future scenario, report does not mention need to assist families and encourage having children - By LifeSiteNews.com Staff

OTTAWA, December 15, 2005 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Canada's population is ageing fast and senior citizens will outnumber children in about a decade, according to new population projections released today by the official government statistical organization.

In all growth scenarios considered for the study, Statistics Canada reports that seniors aged 65 and over would become more numerous than children aged less than 15 around the year 2015. A situation the report describes as "an unprecedented situation in Canada."

By 2031, the number of people aged 65 and over would range between 8.9 million and 9.4 million, depending on the scenario selected, while the number of children would range between 4.8 million and 6.6 million.

While Canada's population is currently younger than the populations of most of the G8 countries, it is expected to age more rapidly in the coming years. This has been a direct result of the pronounced baby boom following the Second World War and the rapid decline in fertility that followed with the legalization and promotion of contraception and abortion and on-going, relentless implementation of Canadian government anti-family policies.

SHRINKING WORKFORCE AND BALLOONING OLD-AGE POPULATION

The findings of the research present a nightmare scenario for Canadian old age security and health care as the workforce shrinks and the percentage of retired Canadians balloons.

The projections show that population ageing, which has already begun, would accelerate in 2011 when the first baby-boom cohort (born in 1946) reaches the age of 65. This rapid ageing is projected to last until 2031, when seniors would account for between 23% and 25% of the total population.

In every projection scenario, the median age of Canada's population would continue to rise. The current median age of the population is 39, that is, half the population is older and half younger. By 2031, it would reach between 43 and 46. In 2056, it would be between 45 and 50.

In addition, the proportion of older seniors, people aged 80 years and over, would increase sharply in every projection scenario. By 2056, an estimated 1 out of 10 Canadians would be 80 years or over, compared with around 1 in 30 in 2005.

IMMIGRATION ALONE "CANNOT REVERSE"

The report stresses, "immigration alone cannot reverse this ageing trend."

However, the prospect of encouraging Canadians to have more children and assisting families is typically nowhere mentioned in the report.

In every projection scenario, the proportion of the working-age population, that is the population aged 15 to 64, would decline steadily in the 2010s and 2020s. Currently, the working-age population represents 70% of the total population. By the beginning of the 2030s, it would decline to 62%, then level off at about 60%.

WORKING CANADIANS WILL BE REQUIRED TO PAY MUCH MORE IN TAXES

Also, in every projection scenario, the demographic dependency ratio would increase rapidly until 2031. This ratio indicates the number of children aged less than 15 years and the number of seniors 65 and over for every 100 working-age people.

In 2005, for every 100 working-age people, there were 44 children and seniors. According to the low-growth scenario, it would start decreasing in 2017.

15 YEARS TILL DEATHS OUTNUMBER BIRTHS

In all the scenarios considered, natural increase would eventually become negative, that is, there would be more deaths than births. This would occur in 2020 under the low-growth scenario, in 2030 under the medium-growth scenario, and in 2046 under the high-growth scenario. As a result, international net migration would become the country's only source of population growth.

Immigration levels contribute heavily to the projected population growth at the national level, as the fertility rate is assumed to remain below the replacement level in all scenarios, a situation observed since the 1970s.

TOP


www.ChristianWireService.com

TOP

 

TOP

Secular Franciscan Order (SFO)

TOP

Sobey's Receipts Are Valuable

Please don't throw away your Sobey's receipts. Click here and see why!

Amount of receipts collected to date: $409,327.06

TOP

 

TOP

 

TOP

 

TOP

 

TOP

 

TOP

 

TOP

 

TOP

 

TOP

 

TOP

 

TOP

 

TOP

 

TOP

 

TOP